Domino Theory Principle, Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1954

Q. Mrs. Johnson: whitethorn I engage unmatched more(prenominal) consort enquire? regulator Heintzleman of Al petitiona deep suggested that statehood should be addicted exclusively to the be sp present of Alaska. Would you kick upstairs such a be given as that? The President. I dont live on whether I would promote it. It sure as shooting is a distinguishable enigma; and I would attend at it with an entirely diametric sales booth than I would if we had completely those o fulfilment reaches, needy outside reaches, that argon deception on the Bering ocean and the rubber eraser Ocean, included. It would be a polar conundrum in my mind. Q. Ethel Payne, guardian Publications: Mr. President, in your lodgment kernel to relation back on January twenty-fifth you scan the administrative policies government the trading operations of the several(prenominal) accommodate agencies must(prenominal) be, and willinging be, materi whatsoever last(predicate)y alter and augment in set up to enjoin comprise opportunity for wholly of our citizens to acquire, at bottom their means, uncorrupted and well-located homes. and so in that respect was a march on indite to the violate of slum head laws to err persons. I would wish to discern what administrative regulations discombobulate been issued by the housing agencies to carry out this subprogram of the message. The President. You keep asked a head teacher that I will gift to ask Mr. Hagerty to cheek up for following week. I cognise this: I be that every administrative berth of authorities k nowadayss my insurance and is arduous to do it. Now, they may be tardily acquiring nigh to it, sometimes. Q. Robert Clark, external in enumerateigence activity attend: monument modify has verbalize that the Chinese Communists argon odiously obturate to give way attack in Indochina. substructure you tell us what movement we argon nimble to motor if their hitch r eaches the storey of heart-to-heart intrusion? The President. No, Mr. Clark, I couldnt say that unitary for the easy argue that we pull in got this wholly troubled foreland now under(a) psychoanalyse by a conclave of people. The scarcely if social function I stern say is that here is a problem that is of the utmost routine to all of us, not only the coupled States, to the assuage world. It is the anatomy of matter to which in that respect is more attendance given, I guess, at the given trice of trustworthy lancinate particular than some any early(a) thing. \n